๐Ÿฅ VAERS Vaccine Data Browser

๐Ÿ”’ Privacy & Data Disclaimer

About This Site

This is a public data browser for the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). By using this site, you acknowledge and agree to the following:

Data Source & Accuracy

  • Public Data: All data displayed comes from the publicly available VAERS database maintained by the CDC and FDA.
  • No Verification: VAERS accepts all reports without verifying medical accuracy. Reports do not prove causation between vaccines and adverse events.
  • Anyone Can Report: Healthcare providers, patients, family members, and anyone else can submit reports to VAERS.
  • Research Purpose: This data is for transparency, research, and monitoring vaccine safety signals only.

Your Privacy

  • No Personal Data Collection: This site does not collect, store, or track any personal information about visitors.
  • No Cookies: We do not use cookies except for remembering that you've seen this disclaimer (stored locally in your browser).
  • No Analytics: We do not use Google Analytics or any other tracking services.
  • Search Privacy: Your searches and filters are not logged or stored on our servers.
  • Public Data Only: The VAERS data shown here is already public and contains no personally identifiable information.

Medical Disclaimer

  • Not Medical Advice: This tool is for informational purposes only and does not provide medical advice.
  • Consult Healthcare Providers: Always consult qualified healthcare professionals for medical decisions.
  • No Liability: We are not responsible for decisions made based on this data.

Data Interpretation

  • The presence of a report does not mean the vaccine caused the adverse event.
  • Coincidental events are often reported (e.g., a heart attack that happened to occur after vaccination).
  • Serious adverse events must be reported by law, even if unrelated to the vaccine.
  • The database is useful for detecting safety signals that require further investigation.

๐Ÿ“– Help & Search Guide

Column Icons Legend

๐Ÿ’€ Death
๐Ÿฅ Hospitalized
๐Ÿš‘ Emergency Room
โ™ฟ Disability
โš ๏ธ Life Threatening

How to Search

๐Ÿ’ก Search Tips:
  • Select Year: Choose a specific year OR "All Years" to search across all data
  • All Years requires filters: When searching all years, you must select at least one filter (lot number, vaccine type, outcome, etc.) for performance
  • Lot number tracking: Use "All Years" + Lot Number to track lots across multiple years
  • Combine filters: Use multiple filters together to narrow results (e.g., Age + Vaccine Type + Death)
  • VAERS ID: Search for specific report by ID number
  • Age: Enter exact age (e.g., 25) or decimal (e.g., 0.5 for 6 months)
  • State: Enter 2-letter state code (e.g., CA, NY, TX)
  • Vaccine Type: Search partial names (e.g., "COVID19", "FLU", "HPV")
  • Manufacturer: Search by company (e.g., "PFIZER", "MODERNA")
  • Lot Number: Search specific vaccine lot (works great with "All Years")
  • Symptoms: Search for any symptom keyword (e.g., "fever", "rash")
  • Death/Hospitalized: Filter to only show cases with these outcomes

Understanding the Data

  • Reports are unverified: VAERS accepts all reports without medical verification
  • Not proof of causation: A report does not mean the vaccine caused the event
  • Anyone can report: Healthcare providers, patients, and family members can submit reports
  • Multiple vaccines: One report may list multiple vaccines given at the same time
  • Blank fields: Not all fields are required, so some data may be missing

Using the Table

  • Sort columns: Click column headers (ID, Age, Sex, Date, Died) to sort
  • Expand text: Click "More" to see full narrative or symptom text
  • Navigate pages: Use pagination controls at top and bottom of table
  • Export results: Click "๐Ÿ“ฅ Export CSV" to download filtered data (max 10,000 records)

๐Ÿ’ก Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is this site?

๐Ÿฅ VAERS Vaccine Data Browser is an independent, third-party data browser for publicly available VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) data.

Important: This site is NOT affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the CDC, FDA, or any government agency. We are an independent service that makes public VAERS data easier to search and analyze.

What is VAERS?

VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) is a national early warning system established in 1990 to detect possible safety problems with vaccines. It's co-managed by the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and FDA (Food and Drug Administration).

VAERS accepts and analyzes reports of adverse events (possible side effects) after a person has received a vaccination.

Official VAERS website: vaers.hhs.gov

Is this data HIPAA compliant?

Yes, absolutely. All VAERS data displayed here is:

  • Publicly available - Published by the CDC/FDA on their official website
  • De-identified - Contains no personally identifiable information (names, addresses, contact info removed)
  • Legally accessible - Available to researchers, media, and the general public under FOIA (Freedom of Information Act)
  • Not protected health information - Once de-identified and published by the government, it's no longer covered by HIPAA restrictions

This site displays the same public data available at vaers.hhs.gov/data.

Why does this site exist?

We believe in transparency and public access to health data. While the CDC/FDA provide VAERS data, their official site:

  • Is difficult to search and filter
  • Requires downloading large CSV files and technical knowledge
  • Is not user-friendly for the average person

This independent site makes the same publicly available data easier to search, filter, and understand for researchers, journalists, healthcare workers, and concerned citizens.

Where does the data come from?

All data is downloaded directly from the official CDC/FDA VAERS website at vaers.hhs.gov/data.

The data is:

  • Publicly released by the CDC/FDA every week
  • Available as downloadable CSV files
  • Imported into this site's database for easier searching
  • Displayed exactly as provided (no modifications or filtering)

This site does not collect, modify, or add to the official VAERS data.

My vaccine lot number matches one with deaths/serious events - should I be worried?

Important context:

  • VAERS reports do NOT prove causation - A report means an event occurred after vaccination, but doesn't mean the vaccine caused it
  • Anyone can report - Reports are not verified for medical accuracy before being published
  • Coincidences happen - When millions of people get vaccinated, some will experience unrelated medical events afterward
  • Large lot numbers - Popular vaccines may have hundreds of thousands of doses from one lot number
  • More vaccinations = more reports - Lots used widely will naturally have more reports

What to do:

  • Don't panic - VAERS data requires expert analysis to interpret
  • Talk to your doctor if you have concerns
  • Check official CDC/FDA safety communications for genuine safety signals
  • Remember: billions of vaccine doses have been safely administered

Can I trust VAERS data?

VAERS is valuable but has limitations:

Strengths:

  • โœ… Early warning system for potential safety signals
  • โœ… Open and transparent - publicly accessible
  • โœ… Accepts all reports regardless of likelihood of causation
  • โœ… Monitored by CDC/FDA experts who investigate concerning patterns

Limitations:

  • โš ๏ธ Reports are unverified - not investigated before publication
  • โš ๏ธ Cannot determine if vaccine caused the event
  • โš ๏ธ Underreporting - not all adverse events are reported
  • โš ๏ธ Overreporting - coincidental events may be reported
  • โš ๏ธ Incomplete data - not all fields are required

Bottom line: VAERS is an important tool for safety monitoring, but individual reports should not be used as proof that a vaccine caused harm.

What are "adverse events"?

An adverse event is any undesirable health occurrence that happens after vaccination, including:

  • Common reactions: Sore arm, mild fever, fatigue (usually expected)
  • Serious events: Hospitalization, disability, life-threatening illness, death
  • Coincidental events: Medical conditions that would have occurred anyway

Important: An adverse event doesn't mean the vaccine caused it - only that it occurred after vaccination. Many reported events are coincidental or unrelated.

Why are some lot numbers listed multiple times?

This is normal and expected! A person may receive multiple doses of the same vaccine from the same lot number:

  • COVID vaccines require 2-3 doses
  • HPV, Hepatitis B, and other vaccines have multi-dose schedules
  • Each dose is recorded as a separate entry

Example: Person receives Pfizer COVID dose 1 (lot ABC123) and dose 2 (lot ABC123) - lot ABC123 appears twice in their report.

How often is this data updated?

The CDC/FDA releases new VAERS data every Friday. This site is typically updated:

  • Weekly or bi-weekly for recent data
  • Check the available years to see what data is currently loaded
  • During updates, the site may be in maintenance mode temporarily

Where can I learn more?

โš ๏ธ DISCLAIMER: This data is from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Reports do not establish causation between vaccines and adverse events. Anyone can submit a report, and reports are not verified. This is raw data for transparency and research purposes only.
34,052
Total Reports (2025)
500
Deaths Reported
1,634
Hospitalizations
30
ER Visits
1,191
Disabilities
570
Life Threatening
๐Ÿ”„ Reset ๐Ÿ“ฅ Export CSV
ID Age Sex State Date โ–ผ Onset Days Vaccine Manufacturer Lot # Symptoms Narrative ๐Ÿ’€ ๐Ÿฅ ๐Ÿš‘ โ™ฟ โš ๏ธ
2848937 18 F VA 07/08/2025 MNQ
NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS
AMB064A
Product preparation issue Product preparation issue
Only diluent administered; Only diluent administered; This non-serious case was reported by a pharma... Only diluent administered; Only diluent administered; This non-serious case was reported by a pharmacist via call center representative and described the occurrence of inappropriate preparation of medication in a 18-year-old female patient who received Men ACWY-CRM NVS (Menveo) (batch number AMB064A, expiry date 31-DEC-2025) for prophylaxis. On 03-JUL-2025, the patient received Menveo. On 03-JUL-2025, an unknown time after receiving Menveo, the patient experienced inappropriate preparation of medication (Verbatim: Only diluent administered) and inappropriate dose of vaccine administered (Verbatim: Only diluent administered). The outcome of the inappropriate preparation of medication and inappropriate dose of vaccine administered were not applicable. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 03-JUL-2025 On 3rd July 2025, a pharmacist called to report that an 18-year-old patient had received only the diluent component of Menveo earlier that day (date of reporting), which led to Inappropriate preparation of medication and Inappropriate dose of vaccine administered. The pharmacist stated, he/she had not mixed it beforehand. They also mentioned that the dose would be readministered later that same day just to be safe. More
2848938 F CO 07/08/2025 COVID19
MODERNA

COVID-19, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease COVID-19, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
currently has COVID-19; also has COPD; This spontaneous case was reported by a consumer and describe... currently has COVID-19; also has COPD; This spontaneous case was reported by a consumer and describes the occurrence of COVID-19 (currently has COVID-19) and CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (also has COPD) in a female patient of an unknown age who received SPIKEVAX NOS (SPIKEVAX NOS) for COVID-19 prophylaxis. No Medical History information was reported. On an unknown date, the patient received dose of SPIKEVAX NOS (SPIKEVAX NOS) (unknown route) 1 dosage form. On an unknown date, the patient experienced COVID-19 (currently has COVID-19) and CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (also has COPD). At the time of the report, COVID-19 (currently has COVID-19) and CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (also has COPD) had not resolved. The action taken with SPIKEVAX NOS (SPIKEVAX NOS) (Unknown) was unknown. No concomitant medication was reported. Patient currently had COVID-19 and also COPD. No treatment information was reported. This case was linked to US-MODERNATX, INC.-MOD-2025-787946 (E2B Linked Report).; Sender's Comments: US-MODERNATX, INC.-MOD-2025-787946:Patient 1 (Master case) More
2848939 NC 07/08/2025 PNC20
PFIZER\WYETH
LN4929
Device breakage, Device leakage Device breakage, Device leakage
Cap and like the little piece that you put the needle on, it come completely off and the medication ... Cap and like the little piece that you put the needle on, it come completely off and the medication leaked out; Cap and like the little piece that you put the needle on, it come completely off and the medication leaked out; The initial case was missing the following minimum criteria: This case has been considered invalid as Info not qualifying for AE reporting - Product Complaint: no indication that the consumer experienced an event under Product Prevnar 20. Upon receipt of follow-up information, this case now contains all required information to be considered valid. This is a spontaneous report received from a Nurse from product quality group. No patient received pneumococcal 20-val conj vac (dipht CRM197 protein) (PREVNAR 20), as dose number unknown (Lot number: LN4929, Expiration Date: Jul2026) for immunisation. The patient's relevant medical history and concomitant medications were not reported. The following information was reported: DEVICE BREAKAGE (non-serious), DEVICE LEAKAGE (non-serious), outcome "unknown" and all described as "Cap and like the little piece that you put the needle on, it come completely off and the medication leaked out". The reporter considered "cap and like the little piece that you put the needle on, it come completely off and the medication leaked out" not related to pneumococcal 20-val conj vac (dipht CRM197 protein). Causality for "cap and like the little piece that you put the needle on, it come completely off and the medication leaked out" was determined associated to device constituent of pneumococcal 20-val conj vac (dipht CRM197 protein) (malfunction). Additional information: NDC Number: 0005200001. While taking the cap off, unscrewing the cap, the cap and like the little piece that you put the needle on, it come completely off and the medication leaked out. It was like the top of the glass vial broke in half. Packaging was sealed and intact. Follow-up (26Jun2025): This is a spontaneous follow-up report received from product quality group. Updated information: device reportability assessment; case has been considered valid. More
2848940 74 M CA 07/08/2025 PNC20
PFIZER\WYETH
LN4930
Cellulitis, Injection site pain Cellulitis, Injection site pain
Cellulitis in the elbow; Severe pain upon administration of Prevnar 20; This is a spontaneous report... Cellulitis in the elbow; Severe pain upon administration of Prevnar 20; This is a spontaneous report received from a Nurse. A 74-year-old male patient received pneumococcal 20-valent conjugate vaccine (dipht CRM197 protein) (PREVNAR 20), on 24Jun2025 as dose number unknown, single (Lot number: LN4930, Expiration Date: 24Jul2026) at the age of 74 years intramuscular, in left deltoid for immunisation. The patient had no relevant medical history. There were no concomitant medications. The following information was reported: CELLULITIS (non-serious), outcome "unknown", described as "Cellulitis in the elbow"; VACCINATION SITE PAIN (non-serious), outcome "unknown", described as "Severe pain upon administration of Prevnar 20". The events "cellulitis in the elbow" and "severe pain upon administration of prevnar 20" required physician office visit. Additional information: The reporting nurse stated, "I am calling because we have had 3 patients complaint of severe pain upon administration of Prevnar 20. Two of which have seen the doctor for cellulitis and cellulitis in the elbow. They both have been assessed by the doctor." Causality was reported as "Yes". Causality for "cellulitis in the elbow" and "severe pain upon administration of prevnar 20" was determined associated to device constituent of pneumococcal 20-valent conjugate vaccine (dipht CRM197 protein) (malfunction). More
2848941 74 F MD 07/08/2025 COVID19
PFIZER\BIONTECH
MD3414
Investigation, Magnetic resonance imaging, Transient ischaemic attack Investigation, Magnetic resonance imaging, Transient ischaemic attack
TIA; This is a spontaneous report received from a Consumer or other non HCP. A 74-year-old female p... TIA; This is a spontaneous report received from a Consumer or other non HCP. A 74-year-old female patient received BNT162b2 omicron (kp.2) (COMIRNATY (2024-2025 FORMULA)), on 28May2025 as dose 1, single (Lot number: MD3414) at the age of 74 years, in left arm for covid-19 immunisation. The patient's relevant medical history included: "Diabetic", start date: 2006 (ongoing), notes: Diabetic, Stated that she was diagnosed around 2006 or somewhere around there.; "Hypertension" (ongoing), notes: Hypertension. There were no concomitant medications. Vaccination history included: COVID-19 vaccine (Primary immunization series completed,, Manufacturer: Pfizer , Dose number in series: Dose 1, Vaccination batch/lot number: FH8028, Location of injection/shot: Believes in was the Left Arm, First Hospitalization was 12Dec2021 and was discharged on 13Dec2021.), administration date: 11Dec2021, for Covid-19 Immunization, reaction(s): "TIA". The following information was reported: TRANSIENT ISCHAEMIC ATTACK (hospitalization) with onset 02Jun2025, outcome "recovering", described as "TIA". The patient was hospitalized for transient ischaemic attack (start date: 02Jun2025, discharge date: 04Jun2025, hospitalization duration: 3 day(s)). The patient underwent the following laboratory tests and procedures: lot of testing: showed the TIA,but there was no damage toher brain, notes: Did a lot of testing and MRI's and a whole lot of other tests. The tests that she had showed the TIA, but there was no damage to her brain; Magnetic resonance imaging: showed the TIA,but there was no damage toher brain.; Sender's Comments: Linked Report(s) : US-PFIZER INC-202500135136 same patient/event, different vaccine dose; More
โœ“
2848942 F MO 07/08/2025 COVID19
PFIZER\BIONTECH

Inappropriate schedule of product administration, Multiple sclerosis Inappropriate schedule of product administration, Multiple sclerosis
Dose 1: Oct2020, Dose 2: Apr2021; slurred speech and eye issues/eventually diagnosed as Multiple Scl... Dose 1: Oct2020, Dose 2: Apr2021; slurred speech and eye issues/eventually diagnosed as Multiple Sclerosis; This is a spontaneous report received from a Consumer or other non HCP. An adult female patient (not pregnant) received BNT162b2 (BNT162B2), in Apr2021 as dose 2, single (Batch/Lot number: unknown) for covid-19 immunisation. The patient's relevant medical history and concomitant medications were not reported. It was unknown if the patient has known allergies. Vaccination history included: Bnt162b2 (DOSE 1, SINGLE), administration date: Oct2020, for COVID-19 immunization. The following information was reported: MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS (disability, medically significant) with onset Apr2021, outcome "not recovered", described as "slurred speech and eye issues/eventually diagnosed as Multiple Sclerosis"; INAPPROPRIATE SCHEDULE OF PRODUCT ADMINISTRATION (non-serious), outcome "unknown", described as "Dose 1: Oct2020, Dose 2: Apr2021". It was unknown if therapeutic measures were taken as a result of multiple sclerosis. Clinical course: After the 2nd Covid shot, the patient began having a slurred speech and eye issues. This was eventually diagnosed as Multiple Sclerosis. The event Multiple Sclerosis resulted to disability or permanent damage. The information on the batch/lot number for BNT162b2 will be requested and submitted if and when received. More
โœ“
2848943 M 07/08/2025 COVID19
PFIZER\BIONTECH

COVID-19, Drug ineffective COVID-19, Drug ineffective
I had covid once before; I had covid once before; This is a spontaneous report received from a Consu... I had covid once before; I had covid once before; This is a spontaneous report received from a Consumer or other non HCP from medical information team, Program ID. An 81-year-old male patient received BNT162b2 omicron (kp.2) (COMIRNATY (2024-2025 FORMULA)), in Oct2024 as dose 1, single (Batch/Lot number: unknown) for covid-19 immunisation. The patient's relevant medical history and concomitant medications were not reported. Vaccination history included: COMIRNATY OMICRON XBB.1.5 (Dose 1, single, lot number unknown), administration date: Mar2024, for Covid-19 Immunization. The following information was reported: DRUG INEFFECTIVE (medically significant), COVID-19 (medically significant), outcome "unknown" and all described as "I had covid once before". No follow-up attempts are possible. Batch/lot number is not provided, and it cannot be obtained. More
2848945 07/08/2025 COVID19
PFIZER\BIONTECH

Death Death
died; This is a spontaneous report received from a Consumer or other non HCP, Program ID. A patient... died; This is a spontaneous report received from a Consumer or other non HCP, Program ID. A patient (age and gender not provided) received BNT162b2 omicron (kp.2) (COMIRNATY (2024-2025 FORMULA)), as dose 1, single (Batch/Lot number: unknown) for covid-19 immunisation. The patient's relevant medical history and concomitant medications were not reported. The following information was reported: DEATH (death), outcome "fatal", described as "died". The date and cause of death for the patient were unknown. It was not reported if an autopsy was performed. Clinical course: 3 of reporter's good friends died, after getting the so called mRNA covid shot (Covid vaccine). No follow-up attempts are possible. Batch/lot number is not provided, and it cannot be obtained.; Sender's Comments: Linked Report(s) : US-PFIZER INC-PV202500081194 same product/event, different patient; US-PFIZER INC-PV202500081195 same product/event, different patient;; Reported Cause(s) of Death: died More
โœ“
2848946 07/08/2025 COVID19
PFIZER\BIONTECH

Death Death
died; This is a spontaneous report received from a Consumer or other non HCP, Program ID. A patient... died; This is a spontaneous report received from a Consumer or other non HCP, Program ID. A patient (age and gender not provided) received BNT162b2 omicron (kp.2) (COMIRNATY (2024-2025 FORMULA)), as dose 1, single (Batch/Lot number: unknown) for covid-19 immunisation. The patient's relevant medical history and concomitant medications were not reported. The following information was reported: DEATH (death), outcome "fatal", described as "died". The date and cause of death for the patient were unknown. It was not reported if an autopsy was performed. Clinical course: 3 of reporter's good friends died, after getting the so called mRNA covid shot (Covid vaccine). No follow-up attempts are possible. Batch/lot number is not provided, and it cannot be obtained.; Sender's Comments: Linked Report(s) : US-PFIZER INC-PV202500081193 same product/event, different patient;US-PFIZER INC-PV202500081195 same product/event, different patient;; Reported Cause(s) of Death: died More
โœ“
2848947 F 07/08/2025 COVID19
PFIZER\BIONTECH

Epistaxis Epistaxis
severe and persistent nosebleeds; This is a spontaneous report received from a Consumer or other non... severe and persistent nosebleeds; This is a spontaneous report received from a Consumer or other non HCP, Program ID. A female patient received BNT162b2 omicron (kp.2) (COMIRNATY (2024-2025 FORMULA)), as dose 1, single (Batch/Lot number: unknown) for covid-19 immunisation. The patient's relevant medical history and concomitant medications were not reported. The following information was reported: EPISTAXIS (medically significant), outcome "unknown", described as "severe and persistent nosebleeds". Additional information: The patient reported experiencing severe and persistent nosebleeds after receiving a Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. The patient inquired about related studies and side effects. No follow-up attempts are possible. Batch/lot number is not provided, and it cannot be obtained. More
2848948 1.25 WA 07/08/2025 HIBV
SANOFI PASTEUR
UK328AA
Product preparation error Product preparation error
administered ACTHIB with the wrong diluent to a patient, with no reported adverse event; Initial inf... administered ACTHIB with the wrong diluent to a patient, with no reported adverse event; Initial information received on 07-Jul-2025 regarding an unsolicited valid non-serious case received from a other health professional. This case involves a 15 months old and unknown gender patient who received HIB (PRP/T) vaccine [ACT-HIB] with the wrong diluent, with no reported adverse event. The patient's past medical history, medical treatment(s), vaccination(s) and family history were not provided. Concomitant medications included diphtheria vaccine toxoid, pertussis vaccine acellular, tetanus vaccine toxoid (DTAP) for Immunization. On 30-Jun-2025, the patient received 0.5 ml of HIB (PRP/T) vaccine Powder and solvent for solution for injection with standard strength (expiry date- 31-May-2026 and lot UK328AA) once via unknown route in unknown administration site for Immunization, with the wrong diluent with no reported adverse event (product preparation error) (latency- same day). Reportedly, they said that they did not observe any adverse reactions afterwards. They wanted to know what the possible effects would be on the patient. Action taken was not applicable. This suspected adverse reaction report is submitted and classified as a medication error solely and exclusively to ensure the marketing authorization holder's compliance with the requirements set out in the Directive 2001/83/EC and Module VI of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices. The classification as a medical error is in no way intended, nor should it be interpreted or construed as an allegation or claim made by the marketing authorization holder that any third party has contributed to or is to be held liable for the occurrence of this medication error. More
2848954 1 M AK 07/08/2025 DTAPIPV
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
5H95B
Product administered to patient of inappropriate age Product administered to patient of inappropriate age
Patient received a dose of Kinrix out of the recommended age/ patient is less than 4 years old; This... Patient received a dose of Kinrix out of the recommended age/ patient is less than 4 years old; This non-serious case was reported by a nurse via call center representative and described the occurrence of inappropriate age at vaccine administration in a 1-year-old male patient who received DTPa-IPV (Kinrix) (batch number 5H95B, expiry date 16-FEB-2026) for prophylaxis. On 08-AUG-2024, the patient received Kinrix. On 08-AUG-2024, an unknown time after receiving Kinrix, the patient experienced inappropriate age at vaccine administration (Verbatim: Patient received a dose of Kinrix out of the recommended age/ patient is less than 4 years old). The outcome of the inappropriate age at vaccine administration was not applicable. This report is made by GSK without prejudice and does not imply any admission or liability for the incident or its consequences. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 18-JUN-2025 The RN (registered nurse) called to report that they administered a dose of Kinrix to 6 different patients under the age of 4 years old, which led to an inappropriate age at vaccine administration. The reporter wanted to know did they need to continue with the same schedule as recommended in the PI (package insert). This was 1 of 6 linked cases, reported by the same reporter.; Sender's Comments: US-GSK-US2025076584:Same reporter/Diffrent patient US-GSK-US2025076587:Same reporter/Diffrent patient US-GSK-US2025076583:Same reporter/Diffrent patient US-GSK-US2025076592:Same reporter/Diffrent patient US-GSK-US2025076595:Same reporter/Diffrent patient More
2848955 20 F 07/08/2025 HEPA
MERCK & CO. INC.
Y013274
Underdose Underdose
Administered pediatric/adolescent vaccine (0.5 mL), FDA approved for up to age 18, to a 20 year-old ... Administered pediatric/adolescent vaccine (0.5 mL), FDA approved for up to age 18, to a 20 year-old patient who requires an adult dose (1 mL) in single IM injection. More
2848956 17 F 07/08/2025 MENB
MNQ
NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS
NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS
52N4S
343DD
Extra dose administered; Extra dose administered Extra dose administered; Extra dose administered
Administered an extra dose of Bexsero, not knowing second dose was completed already in previous yea... Administered an extra dose of Bexsero, not knowing second dose was completed already in previous year. More
2848957 70 M AZ 07/08/2025 VARZOS
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
E754F
Erythema, Herpes zoster, Mass, Pruritus Erythema, Herpes zoster, Mass, Pruritus
Patient presented to clinic for evaluation of spider bite (painful itchy spot on back). Zoster vacc... Patient presented to clinic for evaluation of spider bite (painful itchy spot on back). Zoster vaccine administered. Small red bumps noted on back but also on abdomen. Provider diagnosed patient with active shingles at that visit. More
2848969 1 M ME 07/08/2025 PNC20
VARCEL
PFIZER\WYETH
MERCK & CO. INC.
LG5578
Y011018
Pyrexia, Urticaria; Pyrexia, Urticaria Pyrexia, Urticaria; Pyrexia, Urticaria
Urticaria all over. Fever 100-101.5F Benadryl given. Claritin given. Fever lasted x24 hours. Urticar... Urticaria all over. Fever 100-101.5F Benadryl given. Claritin given. Fever lasted x24 hours. Urticaria abated in 2 days. More
2848970 25 F AL 07/08/2025 HEPA
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
MZ474
Underdose Underdose
Incorrect dose administered. Patient received a pediatric dose instead of adult dose. Incorrect dose administered. Patient received a pediatric dose instead of adult dose.
2848971 30 F NJ 07/08/2025 RAB
NOVARTIS VACCINES AND DIAGNOSTICS

Blood test, Burning sensation, Chest X-ray, Chest pain Blood test, Burning sensation, Chest X-ray, Chest pain
Burning feeling in arms, legs, head, neck, chest Burning feeling in arms, legs, head, neck, chest
โœ“
2848972 55 M WI 07/08/2025 COVID19
COVID19
PFIZER\BIONTECH
PFIZER\BIONTECH
EL3248
EN5318
Prostate cancer, Prostatic specific antigen increased; Prostate cancer, Prostati... Prostate cancer, Prostatic specific antigen increased; Prostate cancer, Prostatic specific antigen increased More
Prostate Cancer - Adenocarcinoma of the prostate Prostate Cancer - Adenocarcinoma of the prostate
โœ“
2848973 18 F 07/08/2025 MNQ
SANOFI PASTEUR
U8438AA
Dizziness Dizziness
Right after administration of vaccine, pt states she feels dizzy. She was instructed to stay in the ... Right after administration of vaccine, pt states she feels dizzy. She was instructed to stay in the clinic, I asked her to lay down. I checked her VS and are within normal. She was monitored for approx 25-30mins, symptoms resolved on it's own. She called her parent to take her home, I did not allow her to drive in case dizziness came back. I instructed if symptoms return or more symptoms occur should go to ER. More
2848974 54 M TX 07/08/2025 PNC21
PNC21
MERCK & CO. INC.
MERCK & CO. INC.


Arthralgia, Chills, Fatigue, Injection site erythema, Injection site warmth; Mal... Arthralgia, Chills, Fatigue, Injection site erythema, Injection site warmth; Malaise, Pyrexia More
6 Hours Post Vaccination: onset chills; fever of upwards of 101 degrees for 3 days; 6 Hours Post Vac... 6 Hours Post Vaccination: onset chills; fever of upwards of 101 degrees for 3 days; 6 Hours Post Vaccination: fatigue, malaise, joint pain felt all over the body (symptoms current); 24 Hours Post Vaccination Injection Site: red and warm to touch (~5"x5") and continues to grow in size More
2848975 49 F NY 07/08/2025 HEPAB
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
324BY
Lip swelling, Swelling face, Throat tightness Lip swelling, Swelling face, Throat tightness
Patient received her 3rd Twinrix shot and approximately 15 minutes later she experienced swelling of... Patient received her 3rd Twinrix shot and approximately 15 minutes later she experienced swelling of her face and lips and tightness in her throat. She went to urgent care to be seen. She was give and antihistamine and observed for 45 minutes and then released with an rx for zyrtec 10mg once daily for 10 days More
2848976 52 M CA 07/08/2025 COVID19
COVID19
PFIZER\BIONTECH
PFIZER\BIONTECH


Angina pectoris, Bundle branch block right, Computerised tomogram, Electrocardio... Angina pectoris, Bundle branch block right, Computerised tomogram, Electrocardiogram abnormal, Influenza like illness; Magnetic resonance imaging heart abnormal, Myocardial fibrosis, Myopericarditis, Sinus bradycardia, Supraventricular tachycardia More
Initially felt flue like symptoms and then pain in heart area next day Initially felt flue like symptoms and then pain in heart area next day
2848977 67 M MD 07/08/2025 COVID19
COVID19
MODERNA
MODERNA


Chills, Gait disturbance, Pain, Peripheral swelling, Swelling; Vertigo positiona... Chills, Gait disturbance, Pain, Peripheral swelling, Swelling; Vertigo positional More
Post injection, nothing happened initially to at least 2AM next day, when the patient went to sleep.... Post injection, nothing happened initially to at least 2AM next day, when the patient went to sleep. Only symptom was slight swelling as expected. On wake up 8AM the patient ,(a Ph.D. neuroscientist) reported a mild horizontal vertigo that persisted for at least 6 hours. The injected left forearm was swollen but not edematous. Some body aches. Chills were experience but no temperature was taken. Fan used. The patient was basically unable to ambulate safely down stairs and went back to bed where vertigo declined. Slept 5 hours. Upon rising around 4PM 7/8/25 symptoms had declined, and patient could ambulate normally with good balance. The patient has had no previous reported history of vertigo or Menniers. More
2848978 50 F VA 07/08/2025 VARZOS
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
7ZM55
Injected limb mobility decreased, Pain in extremity Injected limb mobility decreased, Pain in extremity
Patient reports pain in left arm and inability to raise arm Patient reports pain in left arm and inability to raise arm
2848979 31 F NE 07/08/2025 COVID19
PFIZER\BIONTECH

Amnesia, Pain, Seizure Amnesia, Pain, Seizure
Seizures, memory loss, pain, years of treatments Seizures, memory loss, pain, years of treatments
2848550 AL 07/07/2025 MMRV
MERCK & CO. INC.
Z007214
No adverse event, Product storage error No adverse event, Product storage error
no adverse event; administered post excursion to a patient on 06/30/2025; This spontaneous report wa... no adverse event; administered post excursion to a patient on 06/30/2025; This spontaneous report was received from a nurse referring to a patient of unknown age and gender. The patient's medical history, concurrent conditions, concomitant therapies, and drug reactions/allergies were not reported. On 18-Jun-2025, Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Varicella (Oka-Merck) Virus Vaccine Live (PROQUAD) (lot #Z007214, expiration date: 05-Oct-2026) was exposed to a temperature excursion (6.8 degrees Fahrenheit [F] for 47 minutes). On 30-Jun-2025, the patient was vaccinated with the improperly stored vaccine of Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Varicella (Oka-Merck) Virus Vaccine Live (PROQUAD) (lot #Z007214, expiration date: 05-Oct-2026), 0.5 mL, administered by Health Professional as prophylaxis (route of administration not reported) (product storage error). The vaccine was reconstituted with sterile diluent (MERCK STERILE DILUENT) (lot # and expiration date were not reported). The patient did not experience any adverse side effects from administered dose (no adverse event). More
2848551 50 F 07/07/2025 VARZOS
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
UNK
Injection site discolouration, Injection site pruritus, Injection site rash Injection site discolouration, Injection site pruritus, Injection site rash
Rash around injection site, flushing and itchiness.; flushing; itchiness; This non-serious case was ... Rash around injection site, flushing and itchiness.; flushing; itchiness; This non-serious case was reported by a other health professional via sales rep and described the occurrence of injection site rash in a 50-year-old female patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingrix) for prophylaxis. On 18-JUN-2025, the patient received the 1st dose of Shingrix (left deltoid). On 20-JUN-2025, 2 days after receiving Shingrix, the patient experienced injection site rash (Verbatim: Rash around injection site, flushing and itchiness.), flushing (Verbatim: flushing) and pruritus (Verbatim: itchiness). The outcome of the injection site rash, flushing and pruritus were not resolved. The reporter considered the injection site rash, flushing and pruritus to be related to Shingrix. The company considered the injection site rash, flushing and pruritus to be related to Shingrix. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 26-JUN-2025 The Medical assistant reported that a female patient received the first dose of Shingrix vaccine and experienced rash around injection site, flushing and itchiness More
2848552 74 F MI 07/07/2025 VARZOS
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
UNK
Diarrhoea, Fatigue, Nausea, Retching Diarrhoea, Fatigue, Nausea, Retching
Nausea; Gagging; Diarrhea; Fatigue; This non-serious case was reported by a consumer via call center... Nausea; Gagging; Diarrhea; Fatigue; This non-serious case was reported by a consumer via call center representative and described the occurrence of nausea in a 74-year-old female patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingrix) for prophylaxis. On 27-MAR-2025, the patient received the 1st dose of Shingrix. On 28-MAR-2025, 1 days after receiving Shingrix, the patient experienced nausea (Verbatim: Nausea), gagging (Verbatim: Gagging), diarrhea (Verbatim: Diarrhea) and fatigue (Verbatim: Fatigue). The outcome of the nausea, gagging, diarrhea and fatigue were resolved. It was unknown if the reporter considered the nausea, gagging, diarrhea and fatigue to be related to Shingrix. It was unknown if the company considered the nausea, gagging, diarrhea and fatigue to be related to Shingrix. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 27-JUN-2025 This report was submitted via the online direct entry reporting system. Reporter was the patient, who received her first dose of SHINGRIX on March 27. She stated that a day later, she experienced nausea, gagging, diarrhea, and fatigue. Symptoms resolved for a day and a half. More
2848553 07/07/2025 RVX
UNKNOWN MANUFACTURER
UNK
Pain in extremity Pain in extremity
arm was still sore from the vaccine; This non-serious case was reported by a consumer via interactiv... arm was still sore from the vaccine; This non-serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of pain in arm in a patient who received RSVPreF3 adjuvanted (RSV vaccine) for prophylaxis. On an unknown date, the patient received RSV vaccine. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving RSV vaccine, the patient experienced pain in arm (Verbatim: arm was still sore from the vaccine). The outcome of the pain in arm was not resolved. It was unknown if the reporter considered the pain in arm to be related to RSV vaccine. It was unknown if the company considered the pain in arm to be related to RSV vaccine. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 29-JUN-2025 This case was reported by a patient via interactive digital media. The patient arm was still sore from the vaccine that got almost a year ago. More
2848554 07/07/2025 TDAP
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
UNK
Expired product administered Expired product administered
TDAP that was administered unfortunately it was expired; This non-serious case was reported by a con... TDAP that was administered unfortunately it was expired; This non-serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of expired vaccine used in a patient who received DTPa (Reduced antigen) (Boostrix) for prophylaxis. On an unknown date, the patient received Boostrix. On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Boostrix, the patient experienced expired vaccine used (Verbatim: TDAP that was administered unfortunately it was expired). The outcome of the expired vaccine used was not applicable. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 26-JUN-2025 This case was reported by a patient via (chatbot) interactive digital media. The patient had GSK product TDAP that was administered. Unfortunately it was expired which was Expired vaccine administered. More
2848555 07/07/2025 VARZOS
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
UNK
Incomplete course of vaccination Incomplete course of vaccination
got first Shingrix shot 2 years ago but forgot to get 2nd shot; This non-serious case was reported b... got first Shingrix shot 2 years ago but forgot to get 2nd shot; This non-serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of incomplete course of vaccination in a patient who did not receive Herpes zoster (Shingrix) for prophylaxis. Previously administered products included Shingrix (shot 2 years ago). On an unknown date, the patient did not receive the 2nd dose of Shingrix. On an unknown date, an unknown time after not receiving Shingrix, the patient experienced incomplete course of vaccination (Verbatim: got first Shingrix shot 2 years ago but forgot to get 2nd shot). The outcome of the incomplete course of vaccination was not applicable. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 27-JUN-2025 This case was reported by a patient via (chatbot) interactive digital media. The patient got first Shingrix shot 2 years ago but forgot to get 2nd shot. Till the time of reporting, the patient did not receive 2nd dose of Shingrix, which led to incomplete course of vaccination. More
2848556 07/07/2025 VARZOS
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
UNK
Incomplete course of vaccination Incomplete course of vaccination
received first shot seven years ago, but did not get the second shot; This non-serious case was repo... received first shot seven years ago, but did not get the second shot; This non-serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of incomplete course of vaccination in a patient who did not receive Herpes zoster (Shingrix) for prophylaxis. Previously administered products included Shingrix (shot seven years ago). On an unknown date, the patient did not receive the 2nd dose of Shingrix. On an unknown date, an unknown time after not receiving Shingrix, the patient experienced incomplete course of vaccination (Verbatim: received first shot seven years ago, but did not get the second shot). The outcome of the incomplete course of vaccination was not applicable. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 27-JUN-2025 This case was reported by a patient via (chatbot) interactive digital media. The patient received a Shingrix shot seven years ago, but did not get the second shot. Now his/her doctor wanted to get the second shot. Till the time of reporting, the patient did not receive 2nd dose of Shingrix, which led to incomplete course of vaccination. More
2848557 0.5 M KY 07/07/2025 DTAP
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
GG39D
Expired product administered Expired product administered
Maladministration After the Expiration Date; This non-serious case was reported by a nurse via call ... Maladministration After the Expiration Date; This non-serious case was reported by a nurse via call center representative and described the occurrence of expired vaccine used in a 6-month-old male patient who received DTPa (Infanrix) (batch number GG39D, expiry date 07-JUN-2025) for prophylaxis. On 25-JUN-2025, the patient received Infanrix. On 25-JUN-2025, an unknown time after receiving Infanrix, the patient experienced expired vaccine used (Verbatim: Maladministration After the Expiration Date). The outcome of the expired vaccine used was not applicable. This report is made by GSK without prejudice and does not imply any admission or liability for the incident or its consequences. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 25-JUN-2025 A Registered nurse called to report that a patient had been administered an expired dose of Infanrix, which led to Expired vaccine used. and inquired whether it needed to be repeated. More
2848558 WI 07/07/2025 DTAPHEPBIP
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS

Incorrect route of product administration Incorrect route of product administration
possibly administered subcutaneously; This non-serious case was reported by a other health professio... possibly administered subcutaneously; This non-serious case was reported by a other health professional via call center representative and described the occurrence of intramuscular formulation administered by other route in a patient who received DTPa-HBV-IPV (Pediarix) for prophylaxis. On an unknown date, the patient received Pediarix (subcutaneous). On an unknown date, an unknown time after receiving Pediarix, the patient experienced intramuscular formulation administered by other route (Verbatim: possibly administered subcutaneously). The outcome of the intramuscular formulation administered by other route was not applicable. This report is made by GSK without prejudice and does not imply any admission or liability for the incident or its consequences. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 30-JUN-2025 The clinic supervisor for a pediatric primary care clinic reported that while the medical assistant administered Pediarix was sure it was given intramuscular and the parent who worked in healthcare thought it was given subcutaneously instead, which led to intramuscular formulation administered by other route. The reporter asked was there concern if this is the case. More
2848559 54 M NJ 07/07/2025 VARZOS
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS

Product preparation issue Product preparation issue
Administered Shingrix liquid without mixing the powder; Administered Shingrix liquid without mixing ... Administered Shingrix liquid without mixing the powder; Administered Shingrix liquid without mixing the powder; This non-serious case was reported by a nurse via call center representative and described the occurrence of inappropriate preparation of medication in a 54-year-old male patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingrix) for prophylaxis. On 11-JUN-2025, the patient received Shingrix. On 11-JUN-2025, an unknown time after receiving Shingrix, the patient experienced inappropriate preparation of medication (Verbatim: Administered Shingrix liquid without mixing the powder) and inappropriate dose of vaccine administered (Verbatim: Administered Shingrix liquid without mixing the powder). The outcome of the inappropriate preparation of medication and inappropriate dose of vaccine administered were not applicable. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 01-JUL-2025 The registered nurse reported that a nurse gave Shingrix liquid without mixing the powder to patient, which led to inappropriate preparation of medication and inappropriate dose of vaccine administered. The reporter had 2 different lot numbers for Shingrix on the date of administration, and they did not know which one was administered to the patients, it could be 3J2S2 with expiration date of 27th March, 2027, or 2HJ99 with expiration date of 4th April, 2027. This case has been linked with US2025082620, by same reporter for different patient; Sender's Comments: GSK-US2025082620:Same reporter/Diffrent patient More
2848560 54 M NJ 07/07/2025 VARZOS
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS

Product preparation issue Product preparation issue
Administered Shingrix liquid without mixing the powder; Administered Shingrix liquid without mixing ... Administered Shingrix liquid without mixing the powder; Administered Shingrix liquid without mixing the powder; This non-serious case was reported by a nurse via call center representative and described the occurrence of inappropriate preparation of medication in a 54-year-old male patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingrix) for prophylaxis. On 11-JUN-2025, the patient received Shingrix. On 11-JUN-2025, an unknown time after receiving Shingrix, the patient experienced inappropriate preparation of medication (Verbatim: Administered Shingrix liquid without mixing the powder) and inappropriate dose of vaccine administered (Verbatim: Administered Shingrix liquid without mixing the powder). The outcome of the inappropriate preparation of medication and inappropriate dose of vaccine administered were not applicable. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 01-JUL-2025 The registered nurse reported that a nurse gave Shingrix liquid without mixing the powder to patient, which led to inappropriate preparation of medication and inappropriate dose of vaccine administered. The reporter had 2 different lot numbers for Shingrix on the date of administration, and they did not know which one was administered to the patients, it could be 3J2S2 with expiration date of 27th March, 2027, or 2HJ99 with expiration date of 4th April, 2027. This case has been linked with US2025082618, by same reporter for different patient; Sender's Comments: US-GSK-US2025082618:Same reporter/Diffrent patient More
2848561 5 TX 07/07/2025 DTAP
TDAP
UNKNOWN MANUFACTURER
SANOFI PASTEUR


No adverse event, Product administered to patient of inappropriate age, Wrong pr... No adverse event, Product administered to patient of inappropriate age, Wrong product administered; No adverse event, Product administered to patient of inappropriate age, Wrong product administered More
5-year-old twins who received ADACEL instead of DTaP, with no reported adverse event; Initial inform... 5-year-old twins who received ADACEL instead of DTaP, with no reported adverse event; Initial information received on 02-Jul-2025 regarding an unsolicited valid non-serious case received from a physician. This case involves 5 years old and unknown gender patient who received diphtheria-2/tetanus/5 AC pertussis vaccine [Adacel] instead of diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis vaccine with no reported adverse event. The patient's past medical history, medical treatment(s), vaccination(s) and family history were not provided. On an unknown date, the patient received an unknown dose of suspect diphtheria-2/tetanus/5 AC pertussis vaccine, Suspension for injection (lot number, strength and expiry date not reported) via unknown route in unknown administration site for immunization instead of diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis vaccine with no reported adverse event (wrong product administered) (Latency: same day). Information on the batch number was requested corresponding to the one at time of event occurrence. No follow-up is possible as Reporter cannot be contacted by Sanofi. Reportedly, Immunization medical director states that he was made aware of a situation where there were 5-year old twins who received ADACEL instead of DTaP. Action taken was not applicable. This suspected adverse reaction report is submitted and classified as a medication error solely and exclusively to ensure the marketing authorization holder's compliance with the requirements set out in the Directive 2001/83/EC and Module VI of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices. The classification as a medical error is in no way intended, nor should it be interpreted or construed as an allegation or claim made by the marketing authorization holder that any third party has contributed to or is to be held liable for the occurrence of this medication error.; Sender's Comments: US-SA-2025SA184064: More
2848562 CT 07/07/2025 DTAPIPVHIB
SANOFI PASTEUR

No adverse event, Product preparation error No adverse event, Product preparation error
dtap-ipv portion of pentacel is used to reconstitute priorix with no reported adverse event; Initial... dtap-ipv portion of pentacel is used to reconstitute priorix with no reported adverse event; Initial information received on 01-Jul-2025 regarding an unsolicited valid non-serious case received from a pharmacist. This case involves an unknown age and unknown gender patient who was received with Diphtheria/Tetanus/5 Hybrid Ac Pertussis/Ipv(Vero)/Hib(Prp/T) Vaccine [Pentacel (Vero)] portion of pentacel is used to reconstitute priorix with no reported adverse event. The patient's past medical history, medical treatment(s), vaccination(s) and family history were not provided. On an unknown date, the patient received an unknown dose of suspect Diphtheria/Tetanus/5 Hybrid Ac Pertussis/Ipv(Vero)/Hib(Prp/T) Vaccine,unknown (lot, expiry date and strength not reported) via unknown route in unknown administration site for Immunization, portion of pentacel is used to reconstitute priorix with no reported adverse event (product preparation error). Information on the batch number was requested corresponding to the one at time of event occurrence. Reportedly, Pharmacist confirms that the DTaP-IPV portion of PENTACEL was used to reconstitute Priorix. He explains that he is surprised that this even happened, although PENTACEL and MMR are typically given together, it was still weird that this happened. when the DTaP-IPV portion of PENTACEL is used to reconstitute Priorix; advised that the DTaP-IPV portion of PENTACEL should only be used with the HIB portion of PENTACEL. Action taken was not applicable. This suspected adverse reaction report is submitted and classified as a medication error solely and exclusively to ensure the marketing authorization holder's compliance with the requirements set out in the Directive 2001/83/EC and Module VI of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices. The classification as a medical error is in no way intended, nor should it be interpreted or construed as an allegation or claim made by the marketing authorization holder that any third party has contributed to or is to be held liable for the occurrence of this medication error. More
2848563 0.5 F NM 07/07/2025 DTAPIPVHIB
SANOFI PASTEUR
UK167AA
No adverse event, Wrong product administered No adverse event, Wrong product administered
administered a pentacel and a pediarix to a 6 month old patient, when they should have administered ... administered a pentacel and a pediarix to a 6 month old patient, when they should have administered the act hib along with the pediarix with no reported ae; Initial information received on 02-Jul-2025 regarding an unsolicited valid non-serious case received from a other health professional. This case involves a 6 months old female patient who was administered with Diphtheria/Tetanus/5 Hybrid Ac Pertussis/Ipv(Vero)/Hib(Prp/T) Vaccine [Pentacel (Vero)] and pediarix when they should have administered the act hib along with the pediarix with no reported adverse event. The patient's past medical history, medical treatment(s), vaccination(s) and family history were not provided. Concomitant medications included Diphtheria vaccine toxoid, Hepatitis b vaccine rHBsAg (yeast), Pertussis vaccine acellular 3-component, Polio vaccine inact 3v (Vero), Tetanus vaccine toxoid(Pediarix) ,Pneumococcal vaccine conj 20v (CRM197) (Pneumococcal vaccine conj 20v (CRM197) and Rotavirus vaccine (Rotavirus vaccine) for Immunisation. On 01-Jul-2025, the patient received 0.5 ml dose of suspect Diphtheria/Tetanus/5 Hybrid Ac Pertussis/Ipv(Vero)/Hib(Prp/T) Vaccine, Suspension for injection, lot UK167AA,expiry date: 31-Oct-2025,strength: standard, frequency: once via intramuscular route in the left thigh for immunisation and a pediarix to a 6 month old patient, when they should have administered the act hib along with the pediarix with no reported adverse event (wrong product administered) (latency:same day). Action taken was not applicable. This suspected adverse reaction report is submitted and classified as a medication error solely and exclusively to ensure the marketing authorization holder's compliance with the requirements set out in the Directive 2001/83/EC and Module VI of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices. The classification as a medical error is in no way intended, nor should it be interpreted or construed as an allegation or claim made by the marketing authorization holder that any third party has contributed to or is to be held liable for the occurrence of this medication error. More
2848567 07/07/2025 VARZOS
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
UNK
Incomplete course of vaccination Incomplete course of vaccination
but never got the second; This non-serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital m... but never got the second; This non-serious case was reported by a consumer via interactive digital media and described the occurrence of incomplete course of vaccination in a patient who did not receive Herpes zoster (Shingrix) for prophylaxis. Previously administered products included Shingrix (received 1st dose in 2021). On an unknown date, the patient did not receive the 2nd dose of Shingrix. On an unknown date, an unknown time after not receiving Shingrix, the patient experienced incomplete course of vaccination (Verbatim: but never got the second). The outcome of the incomplete course of vaccination was not applicable. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 26-JUN-2025 This case was reported by a patient via (Shingrix GRC Chatbot) interactive digital media. Patient got the first dose of Shingrix but never got the second dose. The patient wanted to know did he/she now need one more dose or did he/she need two. Till the time of reporting, the patient did not receive 2nd dose of Shingrix, which led to an incomplete course of vaccination. More
2848568 29 F NY 07/07/2025 HEP
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
9237Y
Underdose Underdose
Pediatric dose administered to adult patient; Pediatric dose administered to adult patient; This non... Pediatric dose administered to adult patient; Pediatric dose administered to adult patient; This non-serious case was reported by a nurse via call center representative and described the occurrence of adult use of a child product in a 29-year-old female patient who received HBV (Engerix B pediatric) (batch number 9237Y, expiry date 27-OCT-2025) for prophylaxis. On 22-MAY-2025, the patient received Engerix B pediatric. On 22-MAY-2025, an unknown time after receiving Engerix B pediatric, the patient experienced adult use of a child product (Verbatim: Pediatric dose administered to adult patient) and underdose (Verbatim: Pediatric dose administered to adult patient). The outcome of the adult use of a child product and underdose were not applicable. This report is made by GSK without prejudice and does not imply any admission or liability for the incident or its consequences. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 27-JUN-2025 The Licensed Practical Nurse explained that a patient was about to start her adult series of Engerix B vaccine, but instead they gave pediatric dose which led to adult use of a child product and underdose. More
2848569 F NY 07/07/2025 VARZOS
VARZOS
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
93N4J
93N4J
Injection site erythema, Injection site irritation, Injection site mass, Injecti... Injection site erythema, Injection site irritation, Injection site mass, Injection site pain, Injection site pruritus; Injection site reaction, Injection site swelling, Injection site warmth, Myosclerosis More
Muscle hardening; pretty irritated and a lump; pretty irritated and a lump; she presented a signific... Muscle hardening; pretty irritated and a lump; pretty irritated and a lump; she presented a significant redness near the injection site; she presented a significant warmth near the injection site; she presented a significant swelling near the injection site; she presented a significant pain near the injection site; Itching in the upper left arm (injection site); Irritation at the injection site; Lump at the injection site; This serious case was reported by a pharmacist via call center representative and described the occurrence of muscle induration in a 56-year-old female patient who received Herpes zoster (Shingrix) (batch number 93N4J, expiry date 25-APR-2027) for prophylaxis. Previously administered products included Shingrix (received 1st dose on an unknown date). On 23-JUN-2025, the patient received the 2nd dose of Shingrix (left deltoid). In JUN-2025, less than a week after receiving Shingrix, the patient experienced injection site erythema (Verbatim: she presented a significant redness near the injection site), injection site warmth (Verbatim: she presented a significant warmth near the injection site), injection site swelling (Verbatim: she presented a significant swelling near the injection site), injection site pain (Verbatim: she presented a significant pain near the injection site), injection site itching (Verbatim: Itching in the upper left arm (injection site)), injection site irritation (Verbatim: Irritation at the injection site) and injection site lump (Verbatim: Lump at the injection site ). On 24-JUN-2025, the patient experienced muscle induration (Verbatim: Muscle hardening) (serious criteria GSK medically significant), skin irritation (Verbatim: pretty irritated and a lump) and mass (Verbatim: pretty irritated and a lump). In JUN-2025, the outcome of the muscle induration, skin irritation and mass were resolved. The outcome of the injection site erythema, injection site warmth, injection site swelling and injection site pain were resolving and the outcome of the injection site itching, injection site irritation and injection site lump were unknown. It was unknown if the reporter considered the muscle induration, injection site erythema, injection site warmth, injection site swelling, injection site pain, injection site itching, injection site irritation, injection site lump, skin irritation and mass to be related to Shingrix. The company considered the muscle induration to be unrelated to Shingrix. It was unknown if the company considered the injection site erythema, injection site warmth, injection site swelling, injection site pain, injection site itching, injection site irritation, injection site lump, skin irritation and mass to be related to Shingrix. Additional Information: GSK Receipt Date: 27-JUN-2025 The registered pharmacist reported that a series of adverse reactions presented in a patient that received the second dose of Shingrix after that at the injection site she presented a significant warmth, redness and swelling, pain near the injection site. She improved on the day of reporting (27-JUN-2025) but had just itching in the upper (left) arm, where she received the vaccine. 1 day after vaccination, the patient had her muscle harden, pretty irritated and a lump, but now that has resolved. The vaccine administration facility was the same as primary reporter.; Sender's Comments: Myosclerosis is an unlisted event which is considered unrelated to GSK vaccine Shingrix. More
2848571 37 F PA 07/07/2025 COVID19
COVID19
MODERNA
MODERNA


Antinuclear antibody positive, Antisynthetase syndrome, Electromyogram abnormal,... Antinuclear antibody positive, Antisynthetase syndrome, Electromyogram abnormal, Interstitial lung disease, Myopathy; Pulmonary function test abnormal, Rash, Ventilation/perfusion scan More
I received two Moderna shots the initial and the booster. The first was around Jan/Feb 2021. The sec... I received two Moderna shots the initial and the booster. The first was around Jan/Feb 2021. The second was around April 2021. Both were at different pharmacies. Had a rash and symptoms appear in Sept 2021. More
โœ“ โœ“
2848617 87 F IA 07/07/2025 COVID19
MODERNA
3043332
Death Death
Resident passed away Resident passed away
โœ“
2848618 19 F CT 07/07/2025 VARCEL
VARCEL
MERCK & CO. INC.
MERCK & CO. INC.
2005455
2005455
Dizziness, Flushing, Hyperhidrosis, Hypotension, Syncope; Unresponsive to stimul... Dizziness, Flushing, Hyperhidrosis, Hypotension, Syncope; Unresponsive to stimuli More
Systemic: Dizziness / Lightheadness-Severe, Systemic: Fainting / Unresponsive-Severe, Systemic: Flus... Systemic: Dizziness / Lightheadness-Severe, Systemic: Fainting / Unresponsive-Severe, Systemic: Flushed / Sweating-Mild, Systemic: Hypotension-Mild More
2848619 70 F IL 07/07/2025 VARZOS
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
55th4
Injection site pain, Joint injury Injection site pain, Joint injury
Site: Pain at Injection Site-Severe, Error: Shoulder Joint Injury (prolonged pain, tingling, etc.)-,... Site: Pain at Injection Site-Severe, Error: Shoulder Joint Injury (prolonged pain, tingling, etc.)-, Other Vaccines: VaccineTypeBrand: TDap; Manufacturer: ; LotNumber: ; Route: IM; BodySite: ; Dose: ; VaxDate: UNKNOWN More
2848620 54 F CA 07/07/2025 PNC20
PNC20
PFIZER\WYETH
PFIZER\WYETH
LG5576
LG5576
Arthralgia, Muscle spasms, Pain, Pain in extremity, Paraesthesia; Sleep disorder... Arthralgia, Muscle spasms, Pain, Pain in extremity, Paraesthesia; Sleep disorder, X-ray abnormal More
Systemic: Joint Pain-Severe, Systemic: Tingling (specify: facial area, extemities)-Severe, Systemic:... Systemic: Joint Pain-Severe, Systemic: Tingling (specify: facial area, extemities)-Severe, Systemic: Unable to Sleep-Medium, Additional Details: Patient reports severe burning pain when she wakes up in the morning. Sometimes it wakes her up in the middle of the night. The pain is in her hands, palms, fingers. Fingers tend to cramp/curl up and causes her pain. She hs gotten an xray which showed it could be nerve damage or arthritis, but she states it cannot be arthritis. She has taken gabapentin but can only take it at night since it makes her drowsy. She has a hard time driving and carrying things. She is diabetic. More
2848621 76 F CT 07/07/2025 VARZOS
GLAXOSMITHKLINE BIOLOGICALS
55th4
Syncope, Unresponsive to stimuli, Vomiting Syncope, Unresponsive to stimuli, Vomiting
Systemic: Fainting / Unresponsive-Medium, Systemic: Vomiting-Medium, Additional Details: She fainted... Systemic: Fainting / Unresponsive-Medium, Systemic: Vomiting-Medium, Additional Details: She fainted in the front of the store collapsing on her cart and to the floor. She was responsive to the staff and they got her a chair. She sat in the chair then vomited on the floor. I recieved a phone call from the front store after this happened and went up front to check on her. They had called an ambulance and it was arriving while I was up front. Patient was saying she didn't want to go to the doctor but we recommended she get checked out. She left with the ambulance. More
2848622 75 F CA 07/07/2025 COVID19-2
COVID19-2
PFIZER\BIONTECH
PFIZER\BIONTECH
ME6072
ME6072
Abdominal pain, Asthenia, Confusional state, Decreased appetite, Diarrhoea; Dizz... Abdominal pain, Asthenia, Confusional state, Decreased appetite, Diarrhoea; Dizziness, Fatigue, Injection site pain, Lethargy, Pain More
Site: Pain at Injection Site-Mild, Systemic: Abdominal Pain-Mild, Systemic: Body Aches Generalized-M... Site: Pain at Injection Site-Mild, Systemic: Abdominal Pain-Mild, Systemic: Body Aches Generalized-Mild, Systemic: Confusion-Mild, Systemic: Diarrhea-Severe, Systemic: Dizziness / Lightheadness-Mild, Systemic: Exhaustion / Lethargy-Severe, Systemic: Loss of appetite-Severe, Systemic: Weakness-Medium, Additional Details: According to the patient, She had these symptoms developed 2 days after receiving her vaccine on 6/25/2025. She stated that her confusion was more of realizing that she is experiencing side effects after vaccine because she had never experienced such reactions in the past and described as "I talked my self into believing this because I was very confused." On 6/25/2025, she felt really tired, had diarrhea and no appetite. However, she feels much better, improved today 6/28/2025 More